Radeon Pro 450 vs Radeon R7 M365X
When choosing between Radeon Pro 450 and Radeon R7 M365X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon Pro 450 and Radeon R7 M365X.
Radeon R7 M365X
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Radeon Pro 450 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 450 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 100 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 4080 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Battlefield 5 is 328% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Dota 2 is 95% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Fortnite is 193% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 371% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Metro Exodus is 750% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 11 | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 October 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | + |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |