Radeon Pro 450 vs Tesla C2050
When comparing Radeon Pro 450 and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro 450 and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 450 | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 580% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Radeon Pro 450 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Radeon Pro 450 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 450 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 226 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 2080 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 32% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
Radeon Pro 450 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 450 | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
Code name | Polaris 11 | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 27 October 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | 90 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |