Radeon Pro 450 vs Tesla M10
When choosing between Radeon Pro 450 and Tesla M10, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon Pro 450 and Tesla M10.
Tesla M10
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 450 | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Radeon Pro 450 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Radeon Pro 450 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 450 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 233 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 120 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 450.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| Radeon Pro 450 and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 450 | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell |
| Code name | Polaris 11 | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 October 2016 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |