FirePro S7000 vs Radeon Pro 455
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 455, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 455.
FirePro S7000
Radeon Pro 455 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 455 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 455 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon Pro 455 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 900% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 455.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 455 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 455.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 455 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 455 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 95 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 455.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 455 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 200 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 35% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 35% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 22% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 34% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 25% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 455 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 29% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FirePro S7000. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon Pro 455 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Pitcairn | Polaris 11 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 27 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 855 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 41.04 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,313 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 163 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |