FireStream 9370 vs Radeon Pro 455
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro 455 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 455 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 455 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 455 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 455 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro 455 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 455.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 455 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 455.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 455 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon Pro 455 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 30 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 455 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Battlefield 5 is 21% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro 455 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Fortnite is 18% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Grand Theft Auto V is 19% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Minecraft is 4% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 14% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 22% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro 455 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Polaris |
Code name | Cypress | Polaris 11 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 27 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 855 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 41.04 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 1,313 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Radeon Pro 455 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Radeon Pro 455 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Quadro K5000M
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 480M SLI
- Radeon Pro 455 vs Quadro K5000M
- Radeon Pro 455 vs GeForce GTX 480M SLI