GRID K160Q vs Radeon Pro 455
In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Radeon Pro 455 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 455 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
Radeon Pro 455 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 455 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 455 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon Pro 455 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 271% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 455.
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 455 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 455 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 455 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 455 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 5 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 455 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 3218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Battlefield 5 is 800% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 147% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Dota 2 is 132% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Fortnite is 252% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Forza Horizon 4 is 528% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Grand Theft Auto V is 135% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in World of Tanks is 91% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon Pro 455 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK107 | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 27 October 2016 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 41.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,313 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |