Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon Pro 455
When choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon Pro 455, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon Pro 455.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon Pro 455 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 455 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 455 here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Pro 455 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 208% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 455.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 455 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 455 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 455 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 455 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 255 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 455 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Battlefield 5 is 800% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 147% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Dota 2 is 126% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Far Cry 5 is 800% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Fortnite is 252% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Grand Theft Auto V is 215% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Metro Exodus is 3100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in World of Tanks is 91% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Pro 455 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GT200B | Polaris 11 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 27 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 192 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 855 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 41.04 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,313 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |