Quadro K2200M vs Radeon Pro 455
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro 455, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K2200M stacks up against Radeon Pro 455, check out specs charts below.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon Pro 455 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 455 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 455 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro 455 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 85% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 455.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 455 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro 455 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 455 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 455 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 188 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 455 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 12 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 455.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 19% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro 455 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 22% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro 455 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
| Code name | GM107 | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 19 July 2014 | 27 October 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 41.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 1,313 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |