Quadro T1000 vs Radeon Pro 455
When choosing between Quadro T1000 and Radeon Pro 455, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro T1000 and Radeon Pro 455.
Quadro T1000
Radeon Pro 455 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 455 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 455 here:
Main Specs
Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro 455 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 has 42% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 455.
- Quadro T1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 455 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro T1000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 455 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro 455 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 540 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 455.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 455 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 3000 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 455.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 115% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 93% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 115% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 83% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 129% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 455. |
Full Specs
Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro 455 | |
Architecture | Turing | Polaris |
Code name | TU117 | Polaris 11 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 27 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 855 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 41.04 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,313 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |