Radeon E8860 vs Radeon Pro 455
In this comparison between Radeon E8860 and Radeon Pro 455 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon E8860 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 455 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon E8860
Radeon Pro 455 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 455 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 455 here:
Main Specs
Radeon E8860 | Radeon Pro 455 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon E8860 has 5% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 455.
- Radeon E8860 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 455 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon E8860 and Radeon Pro 455 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Radeon E8860 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 455 - in Mobile workstations.
- Radeon E8860 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 455 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 280 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
- Radeon E8860 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 455 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon E8860 and Radeon Pro 455 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 59% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Far Cry 5 is 110% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Fortnite is 85% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Grand Theft Auto V is 70% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 92% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon E8860. |
Full Specs
Radeon E8860 | Radeon Pro 455 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Venus | Polaris 11 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 25 January 2014 | 27 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 855 MHz |
Boost Clock | 625 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 41.04 |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | 1,313 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 163 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |