Radeon Pro 455 vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When comparing Radeon Pro 455 and Radeon R7 M270DX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro 455 and Radeon R7 M270DX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Radeon Pro 455 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 455 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 455 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 455 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 455 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Radeon Pro 455 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 455 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 45 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 455.
- Radeon Pro 455 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Battlefield 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Dota 2 is 93% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Fortnite is 177% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Forza Horizon 4 is 285% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Minecraft is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 440% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 455 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 11 | Topaz |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 October 2016 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 41.04 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,313 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |