Radeon Pro 455 vs Radeon R7 M350
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon Pro 455 and Radeon R7 M350. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon Pro 455 and Radeon R7 M350. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M350
Radeon Pro 455 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 455 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 455 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 455 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 35 Watt.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R7 M350 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 455.
- Radeon Pro 455 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 455 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 130 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Radeon Pro 455 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon Pro 455 and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| Radeon Pro 455 and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Dota 2 is 82% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Fortnite is 181% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Forza Horizon 4 is 290% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Minecraft is 19% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 455 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 11 | Opal |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 October 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 41.04 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,313 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | + |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |