Radeon Pro 455 vs Tesla T4
When comparing Radeon Pro 455 and Tesla T4, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro 455 and Tesla T4 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla T4
Radeon Pro 455 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 455 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 455 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 455 | Tesla T4 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 70 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 455.
- Radeon Pro 455 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 455.
- Radeon Pro 455 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 455 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 270 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon Pro 455 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 5000 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 455.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 115% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 93% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 115% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 83% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 129% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 455. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 455 | Tesla T4 | |
Architecture | Polaris | Turing |
Code name | Polaris 11 | TU104 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 27 October 2016 | 13 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 768 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 585 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 41.04 | 254.4 |
Floating-point performance | 1,313 gflops | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |