FirePro M4000 vs Radeon Pro 460
In this comparison between FirePro M4000 and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4000 and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M4000 and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 or Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro 460 has 6% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 460 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 300 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 110% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
140−150
220−230
medium / 768p
120−130
190−200
ultra / 1080p
55−60
100−110
QHD / 1440p
30−35
65−70
4K / 2160p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
90−95
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
medium / 768p
65−70
100−110
ultra / 1080p
35−40
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 51% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−11
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 109% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
110−120
medium / 1080p
27−30
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 83% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
14−16
30−33
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
10−12
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 113% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
55−60
95−100
medium / 768p
50−55
85−90
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
5−6
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
7−8
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 18% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 81% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
27−30
60−65
medium / 768p
18−20
40−45
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 107% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than FirePro M4000.
Full Specs
FirePro M4000
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
GCN
Polaris
Code name
Cape Verde GLM
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 July 2012
8 August 2016
Pipelines
512
1024
Core clock speed
600 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
58.05
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
79 Mh/s
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Form factor
MXM-A
StereoOutput3D
+
Check Price
Check Price
