FirePro W5000 vs Radeon Pro 460
In this comparison between FirePro W5000 and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5000
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W5000 has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
FirePro W5000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W5000.
FirePro W5000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W5000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 75 MHz higher, than FirePro W5000.
FirePro W5000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 1800 MHz higher, than FirePro W5000.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
QHD / 1440p
7−8
7−8
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p
210−220
220−230
medium / 768p
180−190
190−200
ultra / 1080p
95−100
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
35−40
high / 768p
140−150
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
95−100
110−120
medium / 1080p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 14% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p
24−27
30−33
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
QHD / 1440p
9−10
10−12
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
medium / 768p
75−80
85−90
high / 1080p
30−33
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
medium / 768p
30−35
40−45
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
Full Specs
FirePro W5000
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Polaris
Code name
Pitcairn
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
7 August 2012
8 August 2016
Pipelines
768
1024
Core clock speed
825 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
Transistor count
2,800 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
39.60
58.05
Floating-point performance
1,267 gflops
1,858 gflops
Length
183 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
3200 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
154 Mh/s
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Form factor
full height / half length
DisplayPort count
2
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price