GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs Radeon Pro 460
When choosing between GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Radeon Pro 460, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GT SLI or Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800M GT SLI
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
130 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 271% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 508 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 400 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 4200 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
5−6
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
9−10
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−11
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
120−130
220−230
medium / 768p
100−105
190−200
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
−
35−40
high / 768p
70−75
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
50−55
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−33
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 83% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 187% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
9−10
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
18−20
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 128% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
10−12
30−33
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 164% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
40−45
85−90
high / 1080p
10−11
35−40
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
4−5
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
10−11
35−40
medium / 1080p
6−7
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 133% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
21−24
60−65
medium / 768p
14−16
40−45
high / 1080p
8−9
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 169% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 44% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce 9800M GT SLI
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
G9x
Polaris
Code name
NB9E-GT2
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
15 July 2008
8 August 2016
Pipelines
192
1024
Core clock speed
500 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
Transistor count
1508 Million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
58.05
Floating-point performance
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
SLI options
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Check Price
Check Price
