GeForce 9800M GTX SLI vs Radeon Pro 460
In this comparison between GeForce 9800M GTX SLI and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 9800M GTX SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 9800M GTX SLI and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GTX SLI or Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI has 328% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
Radeon Pro 460 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 400 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 4200 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 61% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
170−180
220−230
medium / 768p
140−150
190−200
ultra / 1080p
70−75
100−110
QHD / 1440p
40−45
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
35−40
high / 768p
100−110
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
medium / 768p
75−80
100−110
ultra / 1080p
45−50
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 64% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
75−80
110−120
medium / 1080p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 54% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
30−33
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
10−12
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
20−22
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
65−70
95−100
medium / 768p
55−60
85−90
high / 1080p
18−20
35−40
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
6−7
10−12
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
90−95
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
65−70
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 46% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
35−40
60−65
medium / 768p
21−24
40−45
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 70% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
35−40
high / 768p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
G9x
Polaris
Code name
NB9E-GTX
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
15 July 2008
8 August 2016
Pipelines
224
1024
Core clock speed
500 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
Transistor count
3016 Million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
58.05
Floating-point performance
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
SLI options
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Check Price
Check Price