GeForce GT 745A vs Radeon Pro 460
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GT 745A and Radeon Pro 460. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GT 745A and Radeon Pro 460. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GT 745A
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 745A | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 460 has 6% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce GT 745A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce GT 745A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GT 745A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 63 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce GT 745A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 745A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 125% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 360% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 182% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 270% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 136% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 40% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 185% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 262% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 745A | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK107 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 August 2013 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 915 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.28 | 58.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 26 Mh/s | 227 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |