GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon Pro 460
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has 185% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon Pro 460 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 7000 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
50−55
16−18
ultra / 1080p
30−35
10−11
QHD / 1440p
27−30
4−5
4K / 2160p
14−16
−
low / 720p
75−80
35−40
medium / 1080p
60−65
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 177% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
80−85
27−30
ultra / 1080p
70−75
24−27
QHD / 1440p
55−60
7−8
4K / 2160p
27−30
6−7
low / 720p
130−140
60−65
medium / 1080p
90−95
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in Battlefield 5 is 188% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
low / 768p
250−260
220−230
medium / 768p
230−240
190−200
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
QHD / 1440p
150−160
65−70
4K / 2160p
100−110
35−40
high / 768p
220−230
150−160
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
110−120
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
65−70
21−24
ultra / 1080p
60−65
18−20
QHD / 1440p
40−45
18−20
4K / 2160p
21−24
6−7
low / 720p
100−110
45−50
medium / 1080p
65−70
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in Far Cry 5 is 177% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
90−95
27−30
ultra / 1080p
70−75
21−24
QHD / 1440p
45−50
14−16
4K / 2160p
21−24
−
low / 720p
220−230
110−120
medium / 1080p
140−150
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in Fortnite is 141% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
85−90
30−33
ultra / 1080p
65−70
21−24
QHD / 1440p
50−55
10−12
4K / 2160p
30−35
−
low / 720p
130−140
60−65
medium / 1080p
90−95
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in Forza Horizon 4 is 171% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
160−170
95−100
medium / 768p
150−160
85−90
high / 1080p
95−100
35−40
ultra / 1080p
45−50
14−16
QHD / 1440p
40−45
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
35−40
10−12
ultra / 1080p
30−35
8−9
QHD / 1440p
24−27
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
2−3
low / 720p
95−100
35−40
medium / 1080p
50−55
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in Metro Exodus is 235% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
75−80
−
ultra / 1080p
55−60
14−16
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
120−130
65−70
medium / 1080p
85−90
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 172% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
35−40
14−16
ultra / 1080p
24−27
9−10
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−12
−
low / 720p
95−100
30−35
medium / 1080p
55−60
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 184% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
190−200
60−65
medium / 768p
120−130
40−45
high / 1080p
70−75
21−24
ultra / 1080p
40−45
12−14
4K / 2160p
24−27
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 217% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
120−130
90−95
medium / 768p
−
60−65
ultra / 1080p
65−70
35−40
high / 768p
−
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Turing
Polaris
Code name
TU116
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
22 November 2019
8 August 2016
Pipelines
1280
1024
Core clock speed
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
907 MHz
Transistor count
6,600 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
138.0
58.05
Floating-point performance
1,858 gflops
Length
229 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
12000 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
G-SYNC support
+
VR Ready
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.5
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
CUDA
7.5
G-SYNC
+
Multi Monitor
+
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
