GeForce GTX 260 vs Radeon Pro 460
When comparing GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon Pro 460, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon Pro 460 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260 has 420% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce GTX 260 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 260 has 892 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce GTX 260 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 342 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 4001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
20−22
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
120−130
220−230
medium / 768p
95−100
190−200
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
−
35−40
high / 768p
70−75
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
27−30
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
16−18
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 152% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
30−33
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 236% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
9−10
35−40
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
18−20
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
40−45
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 262% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Polaris
Code name
GT200
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
16 June 2008
8 August 2016
Pipelines
192
1024
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
58.05
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
1,858 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
192
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price