GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon Pro 460
When comparing GeForce GTX 275 and Radeon Pro 460, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 275 and Radeon Pro 460 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 275 has 525% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce GTX 275 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 892 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce GTX 275 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 504 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3866 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
10−12
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
130−140
220−230
medium / 768p
100−110
190−200
ultra / 1080p
50−55
100−110
QHD / 1440p
27−30
65−70
4K / 2160p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
75−80
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
8−9
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
110−120
medium / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
12−14
30−33
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−12
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
50−55
95−100
medium / 768p
45−50
85−90
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
4−5
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
6−7
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
10−12
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
24−27
60−65
medium / 768p
16−18
40−45
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Polaris
Code name
GT200B
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
15 January 2009
8 August 2016
Pipelines
240
1024
Core clock speed
1404 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
50.6 billion/sec
58.05
Floating-point performance
673.9 gflops
1,858 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1134 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
127.0 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
3.0
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price