GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon Pro 460
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 285M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI or Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 285M SLI has 328% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 324 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3980 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
QHD / 1440p
5−6
7−8
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p
200−210
220−230
medium / 768p
170−180
190−200
ultra / 1080p
90−95
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
35−40
high / 768p
130−140
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
90−95
110−120
medium / 1080p
45−50
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
30−33
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
8−9
10−12
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p
80−85
95−100
medium / 768p
70−75
85−90
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
65−70
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
30−35
40−45
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
low / 768p
100−105
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
G9x
Polaris
Code name
N10E-GTX
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 March 2009
8 August 2016
Pipelines
256
1024
Core clock speed
576 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
Transistor count
1508 Million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
58.05
Floating-point performance
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1020 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Check Price
Check Price
