GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Radeon Pro 460
When choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro 460, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro 460.
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 282% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is 80 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 4994 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
QHD / 1440p
6−7
7−8
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−33
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
210−220
220−230
medium / 768p
180−190
190−200
ultra / 1080p
100−110
100−110
QHD / 1440p
60−65
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
150−160
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
70−75
70−75
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
18−20
18−20
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
110−120
medium / 1080p
60−65
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−33
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
10−11
10−12
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
medium / 768p
80−85
85−90
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
10−11
10−12
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
medium / 768p
35−40
40−45
high / 1080p
21−24
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK106
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
26 March 2013
8 August 2016
Pipelines
768
1024
Core clock speed
980 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
907 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
58.05
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
1,858 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
