GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon Pro 460
When choosing between GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon Pro 460, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon Pro 460.
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 71% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 120 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 4995 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
27−30
24−27
QHD / 1440p
10−12
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
low / 720p
65−70
60−65
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
220−230
medium / 768p
200−210
190−200
ultra / 1080p
120−130
100−110
QHD / 1440p
90−95
65−70
4K / 2160p
50−55
35−40
high / 768p
160−170
150−160
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
80−85
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
27−30
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
70−75
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Fortnite is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
30−35
30−33
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
14−16
10−12
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
60−65
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
medium / 768p
90−95
85−90
high / 1080p
40−45
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
QHD / 1440p
7−8
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−12
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Metro Exodus is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
medium / 768p
45−50
40−45
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Maxwell
Polaris
Code name
GM107
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
18 February 2014
8 August 2016
Pipelines
640
1024
Core clock speed
1020 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
907 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
43.40
58.05
Floating-point performance
1,389 gflops
1,858 gflops
Length
5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5.4 GB/s
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.25 kh/s
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
640
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
183 Mh/s
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Decred / DCR (Decred)
0.51 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
2.3 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
74.4 Sol/s
Blu Ray 3D
+
Check Price
Check Price
