GeForce GTX 980M vs Radeon Pro 460
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 980M and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 980M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 980M and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 980M and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 980M or Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 980M
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 980M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 980M has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce GTX 980M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 980M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 980M is 138 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 2500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 980M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
16−18
ultra / 1080p
24−27
10−11
QHD / 1440p
18−20
4−5
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
55−60
27−30
ultra / 1080p
50−55
24−27
QHD / 1440p
35−40
7−8
4K / 2160p
18−20
6−7
low / 720p
110−120
60−65
medium / 1080p
65−70
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Battlefield 5 is 114% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 980M and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
220−230
medium / 768p
220−230
190−200
ultra / 1080p
180−190
100−110
QHD / 1440p
110−120
65−70
4K / 2160p
70−75
35−40
high / 768p
210−220
150−160
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 980M and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
45−50
21−24
ultra / 1080p
45−50
18−20
QHD / 1440p
30−35
18−20
4K / 2160p
16−18
6−7
low / 720p
85−90
45−50
medium / 1080p
50−55
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Far Cry 5 is 113% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
65−70
27−30
ultra / 1080p
50−55
21−24
QHD / 1440p
30−33
14−16
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
110−120
medium / 1080p
120−130
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Fortnite is 91% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
60−65
30−33
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
35−40
10−12
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
110−120
60−65
medium / 1080p
70−75
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Forza Horizon 4 is 109% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
140−150
95−100
medium / 768p
130−140
85−90
high / 1080p
75−80
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
14−16
QHD / 1440p
24−27
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
27−30
10−12
ultra / 1080p
21−24
8−9
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
9−10
2−3
low / 720p
70−75
35−40
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Metro Exodus is 142% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
medium / 1080p
120−130
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
27−30
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
9−10
QHD / 1440p
12−14
0−1
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
70−75
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
140−150
60−65
medium / 768p
90−95
40−45
high / 1080p
50−55
21−24
ultra / 1080p
27−30
12−14
4K / 2160p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 131% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
55−60
35−40
high / 768p
−
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 980M
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Maxwell
Polaris
Code name
GM204
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
7 October 2014
8 August 2016
Pipelines
1536
1024
Core clock speed
1038 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1127 MHz
907 MHz
Transistor count
5,200 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
51.84
58.05
Floating-point performance
3,462 gflops
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2500 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
G-SYNC support
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
1536
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
383 Mh/s
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
GameStream
+
GeForce ShadowPlay
+
GPU Boost
2.0
GameWorks
+
BatteryBoost
+
Check Price
Check Price
