GRID K240Q vs Radeon Pro 460
When comparing GRID K240Q and Radeon Pro 460, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K240Q and Radeon Pro 460 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q and Radeon Pro 460 is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 31% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 64% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 54% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 46% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 61% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GRID K240Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
Code name | GK104 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 8 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 907 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |