GRID K260Q vs Radeon Pro 460
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro 460, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K260Q stacks up against Radeon Pro 460, check out specs charts below.
GRID K260Q
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro 460 is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 14% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 58.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |