GRID K280Q vs Radeon Pro 460
When choosing between GRID K280Q and Radeon Pro 460, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K280Q and Radeon Pro 460.
GRID K280Q
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K280Q and Radeon Pro 460 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q and Radeon Pro 460 is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 43% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 39% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 52% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 45% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 58.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |