GRID M6 8Q vs Radeon Pro 460
In this comparison between GRID M6 8Q and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M6 8Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M6 8Q
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 185% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 460.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 178 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 12 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| GRID M6 8Q and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M6 8Q and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GRID M6 8Q and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 2% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| GRID M6 8Q and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| GRID M6 8Q and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| GRID M6 8Q and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GRID M6 8Q and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GM204 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 58.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |