HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon Pro 460
In this comparison between HD Graphics 630 and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics 630 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
HD Graphics 630
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 460 has 133% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- HD Graphics 630 has 60 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 460.
- HD Graphics 630 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- HD Graphics 630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 600 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 and Radeon Pro 460 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 152% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 270% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 32% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 262% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Polaris |
| Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2017 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 58.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |