Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon Pro 460
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon Pro 460, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon Pro 460.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 or Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro 460 has 133% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 600 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon Pro 460 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
QHD / 1440p
4−5
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 34% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
190−200
220−230
medium / 768p
160−170
190−200
ultra / 1080p
85−90
100−110
QHD / 1440p
45−50
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
35−40
high / 768p
120−130
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
85−90
100−110
ultra / 1080p
55−60
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 35% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
85−90
110−120
medium / 1080p
45−50
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 26% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
21−24
30−33
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
7−8
10−12
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
75−80
95−100
medium / 768p
65−70
85−90
high / 1080p
24−27
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−11
14−16
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
8−9
10−12
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
95−100
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
65−70
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
45−50
60−65
medium / 768p
27−30
40−45
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 31% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Polaris
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 September 2017
8 August 2016
Pipelines
48
1024
Core clock speed
300 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
907 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
58.05
Floating-point performance
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
