NVS 510 vs Radeon Pro 460
When comparing NVS 510 and Radeon Pro 460, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between NVS 510 and Radeon Pro 460 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
NVS 510
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 35 Watt.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 103 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3218 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
1−2
35−40
medium / 1080p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
0−1
60−65
medium / 1080p
−
30−35
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p
60−65
220−230
medium / 768p
27−30
190−200
ultra / 1080p
7−8
100−110
QHD / 1440p
−
65−70
4K / 2160p
−
35−40
high / 768p
16−18
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
NVS 510 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
110−120
medium / 768p
10−11
100−110
ultra / 1080p
0−1
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
110−120
medium / 1080p
0−1
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 422% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
0−1
30−33
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
0−1
60−65
medium / 1080p
0−1
30−35
low / 768p
18−20
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 49% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
low / 768p
0−1
60−65
medium / 768p
−
40−45
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
high / 768p
12−14
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than NVS 510.
Full Specs
NVS 510
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK107
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
23 October 2012
8 August 2016
Pipelines
192
1024
Core clock speed
797 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
12.75
58.05
Floating-point performance
306.0 gflops
1,858 gflops
Length
160 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.51 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
3.0
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
17 Mh/s
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price