NVS 810 vs Radeon Pro 460
In this comparison between NVS 810 and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 810 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
NVS 810
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
68 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
8x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
NVS 810 has 94% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
NVS 810 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 2 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
NVS 810 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3200 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 320% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
6−7
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
120−130
220−230
medium / 768p
95−100
190−200
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
QHD / 1440p
21−24
65−70
4K / 2160p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
65−70
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
21−24
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
2−3
6−7
low / 720p
10−12
45−50
medium / 1080p
4−5
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
110−120
medium / 1080p
10−12
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 200% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
5−6
30−33
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−12
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 277% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
4−5
35−40
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
4−5
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
85−90
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 27% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
10−11
60−65
medium / 768p
8−9
40−45
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 480% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
NVS 810
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Maxwell
Polaris
Code name
GM107
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
4 November 2015
8 August 2016
Pipelines
512
1024
Core clock speed
902 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
907 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
33.06
58.05
Floating-point performance
2x 1,058 gflops
1,858 gflops
Length
198 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
5.0
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
