P106 090 vs Radeon Pro 460
In this comparison between P106 090 and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people P106 090 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 090
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| P106 090 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- P106 090 has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- P106 090 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 1 GB more memory, than P106 090.
- P106 090 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- P106 090 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 454 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
- P106 090 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 3008 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 14% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 4% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| P106 090 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
Full Specs
| P106 090 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Polaris |
| Code name | GP106 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 31 July 2017 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.49 | 58.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |