Quadro 7000 vs Radeon Pro 460
When comparing Quadro 7000 and Radeon Pro 460, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 7000 and Radeon Pro 460 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 7000
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 7000 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 204 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 has 482% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Quadro 7000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro 7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Quadro 7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 7000 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 249 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
- Quadro 7000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 1596 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Quadro 7000 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| Quadro 7000 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 7000 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 0% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro 7000 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| Quadro 7000 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| Quadro 7000 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| Quadro 7000 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| Quadro 7000 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| Quadro 7000 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Quadro 7000 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro 7000 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 7000 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GF110 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2 May 2012 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 41.66 | 58.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 163.4 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |