Quadro K1100M vs Radeon Pro 460
In this comparison between Quadro K1100M and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K1100M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K1100M and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K1100M and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1100M or Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K1100M
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K1100M has 28% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
Quadro K1100M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1100M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro K1100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 195 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
Quadro K1100M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 275% more, than Quadro K1100M.
high / 1080p
5−6
27−30
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than Quadro K1100M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
50−55
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro K1100M.
low / 768p
110−120
220−230
medium / 768p
85−90
190−200
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
QHD / 1440p
35−40
65−70
4K / 2160p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
65−70
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than Quadro K1100M.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro K1100M.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
50−55
100−110
ultra / 1080p
24−27
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than Quadro K1100M.
high / 1080p
1−2
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
10−12
45−50
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Quadro K1100M.
high / 1080p
9−10
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
110−120
medium / 1080p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Quadro K1100M.
high / 1080p
6−7
30−33
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
7−8
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 311% more, than Quadro K1100M.
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
35−40
85−90
high / 1080p
6−7
35−40
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Quadro K1100M.
high / 1080p
1−2
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
6−7
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro K1100M.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K1100M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro K1100M.
high / 1080p
5−6
14−16
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
30−35
medium / 1080p
6−7
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than Quadro K1100M.
low / 768p
14−16
60−65
medium / 768p
10−11
40−45
high / 1080p
5−6
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 337% more, than Quadro K1100M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Quadro K1100M.
Full Specs
Quadro K1100M
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK107
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
23 July 2013
8 August 2016
Pipelines
384
1024
Core clock speed
705 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
22.59
58.05
Floating-point performance
542.2 gflops
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2800 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
44.8 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
