Quadro K2000D vs Radeon Pro 460
When comparing Quadro K2000D and Radeon Pro 460, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K2000D and Radeon Pro 460 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000D
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
51 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2000D has 45% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
Quadro K2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000D.
Quadro K2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
Quadro K2000D is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 54 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
Quadro K2000D is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 1000 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000D.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 110% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
140−150
220−230
medium / 768p
110−120
190−200
ultra / 1080p
55−60
100−110
QHD / 1440p
30−35
65−70
4K / 2160p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
85−90
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
medium / 768p
60−65
100−110
ultra / 1080p
35−40
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−11
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 109% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
110−120
medium / 1080p
24−27
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 90% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
14−16
30−33
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
10−12
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 128% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
55−60
95−100
medium / 768p
50−55
85−90
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
5−6
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
7−8
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 81% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
27−30
60−65
medium / 768p
18−20
40−45
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 107% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Quadro K2000D.
Full Specs
Quadro K2000D
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK107
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 March 2013
8 August 2016
Pipelines
384
1024
Core clock speed
954 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
30.53
58.05
Floating-point performance
732.7 gflops
1,858 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
3.0
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
31 Mh/s
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price