Quadro K2200M vs Radeon Pro 460
When comparing Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro 460, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro 460 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 85% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 233 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 12 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 460. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 8 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 907 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |