Quadro T1000 vs Radeon Pro 460
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro T1000 and Radeon Pro 460. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro T1000 and Radeon Pro 460. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro T1000
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 has 42% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Quadro T1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro T1000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 495 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 3000 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro T1000 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro T1000 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 81% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 113% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Architecture | Turing | Polaris |
| Code name | TU117 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |