Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon Pro 460
When comparing Radeon HD 7670A and Radeon Pro 460, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon HD 7670A and Radeon Pro 460 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 7670A
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 7670A | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 7670A has 28% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Radeon HD 7670A is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Radeon HD 7670A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- Radeon HD 7670A is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 300 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Radeon HD 7670A is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 90% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 440% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 366% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 7670A | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Polaris |
Code name | Turks | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 5 January 2012 | 8 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 480 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 907 MHz | |
Transistor count | 716 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 14.40 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |