Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon Pro W5500M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon Pro W5500M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon Pro W5500M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 142% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Radeon Pro 460 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon Pro W5500M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Radeon Pro 460 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 460 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 7000 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 14% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
| Architecture | Polaris | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT | Navi 14 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 8 August 2016 | 10 February 2020 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1408 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 6,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 127.6 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |