Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon R7 250
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R7 250 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 460 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 250 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
N/A
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R7 250 has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 250.
Radeon Pro 460 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 250 - in Desktops.
Radeon Pro 460 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 250 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3850 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
3−4
ultra / 1080p
10−11
1−2
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
14−16
medium / 1080p
21−24
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
27−30
6−7
ultra / 1080p
24−27
4−5
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
60−65
18−20
medium / 1080p
30−35
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
50−55
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
220−230
120−130
medium / 768p
190−200
90−95
ultra / 1080p
100−110
45−50
QHD / 1440p
65−70
24−27
4K / 2160p
35−40
−
high / 768p
150−160
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
medium / 1080p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
110−120
80−85
medium / 768p
100−110
55−60
ultra / 1080p
70−75
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 73% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
21−24
4−5
ultra / 1080p
18−20
4−5
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
2−3
low / 720p
45−50
14−16
medium / 1080p
21−24
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
27−30
10−12
ultra / 1080p
21−24
7−8
QHD / 1440p
14−16
1−2
low / 720p
110−120
50−55
medium / 1080p
60−65
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 182% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
30−33
8−9
ultra / 1080p
21−24
7−8
QHD / 1440p
10−12
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
60−65
21−24
medium / 1080p
30−35
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 220% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
95−100
45−50
medium / 768p
85−90
35−40
high / 1080p
35−40
8−9
ultra / 1080p
14−16
4−5
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
10−12
2−3
ultra / 1080p
8−9
1−2
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
9−10
medium / 1080p
14−16
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
110−120
90−95
high / 1080p
−
85−90
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon R7 250.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
65−70
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
14−16
5−6
ultra / 1080p
9−10
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
7−8
medium / 1080p
18−20
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
60−65
18−20
medium / 768p
40−45
12−14
high / 1080p
21−24
6−7
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
35−40
16−18
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Radeon R7 250.
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon R7 250
Architecture
Polaris
GCN
Code name
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Oland XT
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
8 August 2016
1 October 2013
Pipelines
1024
384
Core clock speed
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
3,000 million
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
58.05
25.20
Floating-point performance
1,858 gflops
716.8 gflops
Length
168 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
72 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
227 Mh/s
117 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Design
reference
CrossFire
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
3 Mh/s
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price
