Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon R7 A360
When comparing Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R7 A360, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R7 A360 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 A360
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Radeon Pro 460 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 460 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 175 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A360 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 4997 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | − |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | − |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 422% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 768p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon R7 A360. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT | Meso |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 8 August 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 907 MHz | 980 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 23.52 |
Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |