Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon R7 M365X
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R7 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 460 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M365X
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R7 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Radeon Pro 460 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 460 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 253% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 740% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 8 August 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | + |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |