Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon R9 370
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R9 370. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R9 370. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 370
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 214% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Radeon Pro 460 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 370 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 370.
- Radeon Pro 460 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 460 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 25 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 600 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 81% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 113% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT | Trinidad |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 8 August 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 78.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
| Length | 221 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | 336 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |