Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon R9 M270X
When choosing between Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R9 M270X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R9 M270X.
Radeon R9 M270X
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 460 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R9 M270X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Radeon Pro 460 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 460 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 175 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 155% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 111% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 8 August 2016 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 907 MHz | 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | + |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |