Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon R9 M375X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R9 M375X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R9 M375X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 M375X
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 460 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M375X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R9 M375X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Radeon Pro 460 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 460 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M375X is 25 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M375X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 75% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 44% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 91% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 67% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 46% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 70% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 8 August 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | 1015 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 40.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 1,299 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | + |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Check Price |