Radeon Pro 460 vs Tesla M10
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M10, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon Pro 460 stacks up against Tesla M10, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M10
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 460 | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Radeon Pro 460 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Radeon Pro 460 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 460 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 133 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 0% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 460 | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell |
| Code name | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 8 August 2016 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |