Radeon Pro 460 vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 460 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M6
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 460 | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 185% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Radeon Pro 460 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Radeon Pro 460 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 460 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 30 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 12 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 95% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 115% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 110% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 131% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 460. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 460 | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 8 August 2016 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 907 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |