Radeon Pro 460 vs Tesla M60
When comparing Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M60, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M60 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M60
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 460 | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 757% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Radeon Pro 460 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Radeon Pro 460 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 460 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 343 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 12 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 114% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Radeon Pro 460 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 113% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 135% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 120% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 460. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 460 | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 8 August 2016 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 907 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |